Samuel P. Huntington
Hardcover | Pages: 352 pages Rating: 3.75 | 9433 Users | 697 Reviews
Define Books Supposing Civilizacijų susidūrimas ir pasaulio pertvarka
| Original Title: | The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order ISBN13 9786094440182 |
| Edition Language: | Lithuanian |
Representaion As Books Civilizacijų susidūrimas ir pasaulio pertvarka
Knygos autorius Samuel P. Huntington – amerikiečių politologas, Harvardo universiteto profesorius, dėstęs jame penkis dešimtmečius.
„Civilizacijų susidūrimas ir pasaulio pertvarka“ – stebinanti ir provokuojanti knyga apie kardinalius pokyčius pasaulio politikoje žlugus komunistinei santvarkai. Politologas aiškina, kaip neišvengiamas skirtingų civilizacijų susidūrimas po Šaltojo karo visiškai pakeitė tautų bei kultūrinių ideologijų padėtį šių dienų politikoje. Autorius analizuoja šiais laikais nuolat kintančią politinę kultūrą ir pateikia neįtikėtinų ateities prognozių.
Details Appertaining To Books Civilizacijų susidūrimas ir pasaulio pertvarka
| Title | : | Civilizacijų susidūrimas ir pasaulio pertvarka |
| Author | : | Samuel P. Huntington |
| Book Format | : | Hardcover |
| Book Edition | : | Special Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 352 pages |
| Published | : | 2011 by Metodika (first published 1996) |
| Categories | : | Politics. Nonfiction. History. Political Science. International Relations. Philosophy |
Rating Appertaining To Books Civilizacijų susidūrimas ir pasaulio pertvarka
Ratings: 3.75 From 9433 Users | 697 ReviewsDiscuss Appertaining To Books Civilizacijų susidūrimas ir pasaulio pertvarka
I have been meaning to get around to this book for awhile. It is certainly influential. it is so influential that it may feed somewhat into the problems it forecasts like Spengler in 30s Germany. however I don't want to beat on the messenger too much. Some of schema of differing civilizations has some truth and modernization is nor westernization. However with grand theories like declines of the West or clashes of civilizations they too simplistic and worse yet too polarizing. But such books and-
Hypothesis It is my hypothesis that the fundamental source of conflict in this new world will not be primarily ideological or primarily economic. The great divisions among humankind and the dominating source of conflict will be cultural. Nation states will remain the most powerful actors in world affairs, but the principal conflicts of global politics will occur between nations and groups of different civilizations. The clash of civilizations will dominate global politics. The fault lines
A fascinating look at contemporary civilizations and the contrasts between them. The author analyzes these contrasts and considers them dangerously divisive arguing that have already caused wars and conflicts, and that they will do so again - citing various examples of where these have already occurred and where they will in the future.He lists the major contemporary civilizations as Sinic, Japanese, Hindu, Islamic, Orthodox, Western, Latin American and (possibly) African. I enjoyed reading his
One of the masterpieces of the modern world, the book clearly identifies the great and unique civilizations of the world including Sinic, Japanese, Hindu, Islamic, Orthodox, Western, Latin American and possibly African. The division of these civilizations in lone, cleft and torn countries is a result of influence of (mainly) the Western Civilization over others. The major argument of the book, that the world is divided into a Western one and non-Western many would raise many eyebrows. The books
I have found that political worksespecially those suffused with predictions of future world eventssimply do not age well. Huntington's central thesis that the post-Cold war order will be drawn along cultural and social lines remains relevant to modern 21st century politics. But I was irked by many of his forecasts.For example, he predicted that Mandarin would replace English as a lingua franca for the new age. Given the enormous population of China it's not easy to see why this is a fairly
This is one of those books that everyone dumps on but few people have actually read or considered fairly. It's also the kind of book that area specialists love to tear apart, but to fairly consider his argument you have to be willing to accept a certain level of generalization. Granted, there is a lot to criticize here, but also a lot to learn. If anything, it's a vital book for understanding how a lot of people think about the world. It is a "big book" in the sense that it tries to explain the
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.